Why the Persistent Mislabeling of Meghan Markle as the Duchess of Sussex as a Princess
The question of why journalists and critics continue to refer to Duchess Meghan, formally known as Meghan Markle, as a Princess despite her explicit title as the Duchess of Sussex, remains a contentious issue. This article aims to clarify the reasons behind this mislabeling, based on the historical context and the protocol surrounding royal titles.
Historical Context and Protocol
Strictly speaking, the title Duchess of Sussex is the only title afforded to Meghan Markle. The term Princess, while often used colloquially, is not a legally recognized title within the British royal family. Historical precedent does not support the use of Princess Meghan, and such a label is considered incorrect. The title of Princess is reserved for specific roles, such as Princess of Wales or Princess Royal.
The Agreement Post-Exit
Following the couple's announcement to step back from their roles as junior royals, they were required to cease using the term Royal Highness (HRH) in their titles. This decision was made as part of the Sandringham summit in 2020 and was enforced by the Queen. The agreement also stipulated that they would not use their titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex to sell any products or services online. Despite this, Meghan Markle continues to insist on the use of the term Duchess, much to her own frustration.
Reasons for the Mislabeling
There are several reasons why journalists and critics continue to refer to Meghan Markle as a Princess. Firstly, it is often a result of a lack of respect for her role within the royal family. Historically, the British royal family values protocol and tradition, and the mislabeling might be seen as a sign of disregard for these norms.
1. Disrespect for Protocol
Journalists and critics often overlook the strict protocols and historical traditions within the royal family. The use of incorrect titles can be seen as a demonstration of their disregard for these rules. This disrespect can manifest in various forms, from casual mislabeling to more serious critiques of her role and activities within the royal family.
2. Misaligned Private Life with Royal Duties
Harry's decision to step back from royal duties and pursue a more private life can be seen as a departure from the traditional role of senior royals. By not using the title HRH, it is emphasized that he is no longer representing the Crown. This change in protocol helps to distinguish between personal and official representations of the royal family, especially in light of his and Meghan's humanitarian efforts and charitable work. The use of HRH implies a level of representation that Harry and Meghan no longer wish to undertake.
3. Legal and Contractual Strips
As part of their exit from the U.K., Prince Harry and Meghan were required to comply with certain conditions, including the relinquishment of certain royal titles and styles. Specifically, they were not allowed to use HRH to sell any products or services. This was a clear contractual agreement, and their breach of this agreement was only rectified after intervention from Kensington Palace. Despite this, the title of Duchess still holds some legal recognition, but not that of HRH.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the persistent mislabeling of Meghan Markle as a Princess, despite her clearly defined title as the Duchess of Sussex, is often a result of a lack of respect for protocol, a desire to emphasize the shift in their roles, and compliance with legal and contractual agreements. While this may be frustrating for Meghan, it highlights the complexities of the modern royal family and the evolving nature of their public and private roles.